Already Have a Market Maker? 5 Metrics Every Crypto Founder Should Monitor 

Having a market maker is an important step for any crypto project. But signing an agreement doesn't automatically mean your token has a healthy secondary market.

Market conditions change, trading activity fluctuates, and liquidity requirements evolve as projects grow.

That's why regularly evaluating your market maker's performance is just as important as choosing one in the first place.

1. Are Your Trading Spreads Competitive?

The bid-ask spread is the difference between the highest buying price and the lowest selling price.

Wider spreads can make trading more expensive and discourage participation, especially for larger traders.

A good liquidity review should examine:

• Average spreads across your listed exchanges
• Spread consistency during volatile market conditions
• Differences in execution costs between trading venues

The goal isn't necessarily to achieve the tightest possible spread at all times, but to maintain competitive and sustainable trading conditions.

2. Is There Enough Order Book Depth?

A token may show significant trading volume while still having limited liquidity.

Order book depth measures how much buying and selling interest exists at different price levels.

For example, if a relatively small market order causes substantial price movement, the market may lack sufficient depth.

Projects should regularly review liquidity available within 1% and 2% of the mid-price, as well as the estimated slippage for different order sizes.

Healthy liquidity is about the ability to execute trades efficiently, not simply reporting high trading volume.

3. How Consistent Is Execution Quality?

Liquidity should remain functional beyond periods of strong market activity.

Projects should assess how their market maker performs during:

• High-volatility trading sessions
• Sudden changes in buying or selling pressure
• Periods of lower trading activity
• Major announcements and token unlocks

Metrics such as quote uptime, spread stability, slippage, and order execution quality can help identify potential weaknesses.

4. Is Your Liquidity Fragmented Across Exchanges?

As projects expand to additional centralized and decentralized exchanges, liquidity management becomes more complex.

One exchange may have reasonable depth while another experiences wide spreads or significant price differences.

Without coordinated liquidity management, fragmented markets can increase execution costs and create inconsistent trading experiences.

Reviewing liquidity across all active venues can help projects identify where capital is being used efficiently and where adjustments may be needed.

5. Are You Receiving Transparent Performance Reports?

A market maker should provide meaningful visibility into the liquidity services being delivered.

Projects should understand how performance is measured and whether agreed service levels are being met.

Useful reporting metrics include:

• Bid-ask spreads and order book depth
• Quote uptime and liquidity availability
• Estimated slippage at different trade sizes
• Exchange-level performance and market conditions
• Liquidity inventory and capital utilization, where applicable

Regular reporting helps project teams make informed decisions rather than relying on assumptions about market quality.

6. Does Your Current Strategy Still Match Your Project's Goals?

A liquidity strategy designed for a token's initial launch may no longer be appropriate six months later.

A project might have expanded to new exchanges, experienced changes in trading volume, introduced new liquidity pools, or approached major token unlocks.

Each development can change its liquidity requirements.

This doesn't necessarily mean replacing an existing market maker.

Sometimes, reviewing the current strategy, adjusting liquidity allocation, or improving performance targets is enough.

The important thing is ensuring that the strategy continues to support the project's evolving needs.

How Trireme Trading Can Help

At Trireme Trading, we believe effective market making should be measured by market quality, transparency, and execution.

Whether a project is preparing for its first token launch or already working with an existing market maker, reviewing its liquidity structure can help identify opportunities for improvement.

Our approach focuses on:

• CEX and DEX liquidity management
• Order book depth and spread optimization
• Cross-exchange liquidity coordination
• Market monitoring and performance analysis
• Liquidity planning around major project milestones

Already working with a market maker?

It may be time to review whether your current liquidity strategy still meets your goals.

Connect with Trireme Trading to discuss your token's market structure and potential areas for improvement.

Final Thought

Having a market maker is only the beginning.

The real question is whether your token's liquidity remains efficient, measurable, and aligned with your project's long-term objectives.

Don't just measure trading volume. Measure market quality.

‍